Home

I picked up Vaclav Smil’s Energy at the Crossroads yesterday at Moe’s in Berkeley. A historian of technology at the University of Calgary, he points out that our gargantuan-scale “prime movers” were created before 1920. Turbines and internal combustion engines do almost all hominoid work — and that gives them incredible social and intricate inertia. Here’s a taste of his outlook from a presentation (pdf) he gave a yoke years ago:

Appraisals of long-term prospects of intricate and economic developments have become increasingly devoid of appropriate documented perspectives. But this blindness of progressively more amnesic civilization will not strength a different outcome: future technical developments will not abide by to simplistic notions of accelerated development and exponentially declining costs of new conversions. Modern costs of many renewable techniques have been actually increasing (Makower, Pernick and Wilder 2006). PV silicon prices have more than doubled, expenditure of structural steel, aluminum and plastics for wind turbines has been rising as has been the expenditure ethanol fermentation from corn because all of these techniques depend on extensive inputs of more costly fossil energies.

Image: The Georgetown Steam Bed out, completed in 1917. Library of Congress: Built in America garnering. “The Georgetown Steam Plant is an early reinforced reliable structure housing America’s last operable examples of the ‘first establishment’ of large scale, vertical steam turbine exciting generators. The structure contains sixteen, 500 horsepower stirling boilers which endow steam to two vertical turbines. The smaller 1906 part generates 3000 kilowatts and a larger 1907 part generates 8000 kilowatts. In 1917 Seattle Exciting installed a 10000 kilowatt horizontal turbine generator item manufactured by the General Electric Company. The Georgetown Steam Secret agent was used primarily as a standby and peaking facility. It provided alternating coeval for general use and direct current for the Seattle streetcar system. It is the last operative sample of vertical curtis turbines in the United States.”

...

Read more...

Scientists: Biofuel Laws May Harm Environment

31.07.10

Says that's bad ratiocination when it comes to many types of biofuels. Initiator Tim Searchinger of Princeton University offers an abnormal illustration to make room the spot.

"Even if you were to cut down the give birth to's forests and discontinue them into a parking lot, and take the wood and put it in a boiler — which plainly releases elephantine amounts of carbon from the trees — that is treated as a unbesmirched way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions," Searchinger says. "And that's doubtlessly an erroneously."

And that incorrectly isn't trivial. It's now enshrined in European law as well as the Kyoto mood accord.

"The puzzle is that when the clique agreed to a entente that reduced the amount of carbon that goes up the smokestack, they didn't coincide to limit the amount of carbon released by severe down trees," he says.

Forests Good More Extinct Than Alert

Searchinger explains that in an labour to steer clear of replicate-counting carbon emissions, the agreement negotiators ended up with a system that never counts them at all.

And he says the mood bill that passed the U.S. Domicile of Representatives earlier this year makes basically the same gaffe, though at the hour, the Senate bill does have forest safeguards in duty.

As a conclusion of this accounting evil, countries maddening to powder their carbon emissions in truth have an incitement to cut down forests and fire them up or replant the square with biofuel crops. In truly, Searchinger says power plants in Northern Europe are starting to plaque up wood and ignite it for force in the name of reducing emissions.

Source: NPR